Main Article Content

Authors

Udo Usiere Akpan*
Bessie Udo Akpan

Abstract

Television programme opening credits are audiovisuals that shape impressions, establish programme identity, and stimulate audience anticipation. Limited attention is given to how audiences in West African countries perceive and prefer opening credits. This study investigated the anatomy of television programme opening credits and their relationship with public perception among viewers in selected West African countries.  It identified the most preferred opening credit styles, examined viewers’ preferred aesthetic elements, assessed perceived audience gains, and explored audience perceptions of opening credits. It adopted the Uses and Gratifications Theory and the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. An online survey design was adopted in reaching respondents. The study population was approximately 100 million television viewers. A sample size of 800 respondents was derived. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire distributed online. Findings revealed that the central opening credit style was the most preferred among respondents, with 568 out of 800 participants (71%) indicating preference for the style over other formats presented. Respondents also identified high-quality imagery, typography, colour combinations, and music as major aesthetic elements influencing their attraction to opening credit sequences. Furthermore, viewers perceived opening credits as valuable for narrative orientation, emotional stimulation, programme identification, cultural representation, anticipatory engagement, and continuity of viewing experience. It concluded that opening credit elements are strategic communication tools enhancing audience connection and programme identity. It therefore recommended that television producers and broadcast designers prioritise visually appealing imagery, typography, colour schemes, and sound design in developing opening credit sequences that resonate with viewers across diverse cultural contexts.

Keywords:
credit, perception, programmes, public, opening

Article Details

References

[1]Ellis, J., & McLane, B. A. (2005). A new history of documentary film. New York, NY: Continuum.

[2]Bignell, J. (2013). An introduction to television studies (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203134955

[3]Ogunleye, F. (2014). Television, culture and social change in West Africa. African Journalism Studies, 35(3), 45–60.

[4]Haynes, J. (2007). Nollywood: The creation of Nigerian film genres. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

[5]Leshin, E. (2016). African television and cultural dynamics. Dakar, Senegal: African Media Research Institute.

[6]Okunna, C. (2002). Teaching rhetoric and communication in Nigeria. Enugu, Nigeria: African Heritage Press.

[7]Alamu, O. (2018). Audience engagement with televisual narratives in West Africa. Journal of African Media Studies, 10(2), 151–168.

[8]Biney, A. (2020). Social media and television viewing patterns in Ghana. Media International Africa.

[9]Caldwell, J. T. (2008). Production culture: Industrial reflexivity and critical practice in film and television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11sn72d

[10]Krasner, J. (2013). Motion graphic design: Applied history and aesthetics (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Focal Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780240824703

[11]Butler, J. G. (2018). Television style. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315181295

[12]Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2019). Film art: An introduction (12th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

[13]Tagg, P. (2013). Music's meanings: A modern musicology for non-musos. New York, NY: The Mass Media Music Scholars' Press.

[14]Tryon, C. (2013). On-demand culture: Digital delivery and the future of movies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

[15]Zettl, H. (2015). Sight, sound, motion: Applied media aesthetics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

[16]Tuggle, C. A., Carr, F., & Huffman, S. (2020). Broadcast news handbook: Writing, reporting, and producing in the age of social media (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

[17]Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV: The poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York, NY: New York University Press.

[18]Lotz, A. D. (2022). Media disrupted: Surviving pirates, cannibals, and streaming wars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13868.001.0001

[19]Jenner, M. (2022). Binge-watching and contemporary television culture. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474461986.001.0001

[20]Pearson, R. (2021). Seriality and audience interpretation in contemporary television. Television & New Media, 22(6), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476421998253

[21]Fahlenbrach, K. (2021). Audiovisual aesthetics and emotional design in contemporary television title sequences. Projections, 15(2), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2021.150204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/proj.2021.150204

[22]Kassabian, A. (2021). Streaming music and affective engagement in audiovisual media. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 33(3), 112–128. https://doi.org/10.1525/jpms.2021.33.3.112

[23]Johnson, C. (2021). Branding and aesthetics in post-network television. Media, Culture & Society, 43(7), 1245–1260. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437211022745

[24]Ogunleye, F. (2023). Cultural symbolism and audience reception in African television aesthetics. Journal of African Media Studies, 15(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00105_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/jams_00105_1

[25]Franklin, R. (2024). Building suspense: A critical examination of foreshadowing devices in TV series opening credits. Art and Society, 3(2), 45–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/AS.2024.04.02

[26]Dhoest, A., & Simons, N. (2016). Still "watching" TV? The consumption of TV fiction by engaged audiences. Media and Communication, 4(3), 20–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i3.427

[27]Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

[28]Ruggiero, T. E. (2021). Uses and gratifications theory in the digital age. Journal of Media Studies, 12(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1893214

[29]Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (4th ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

[30]Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2021). The value of online surveys: A review of research and practice. Journal of Business Research, 129, 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.037

[31]Wright, K. B. (2022). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and methodological considerations of online survey research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac005

[32]Akpan, U. U., & Udo, G. (2025). Broadcasting technology training and career development: Gaging counselling methods in Nigerian universities. Educational Dimension. https://doi.org/10.55056/ed.880 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55056/ed.880

[33]Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper and Row.

[34]Moyo, L. (2024). Broadcasting and film industries in Africa: Re-animating African cultural agency. In Cultural policy and cultural industries in Africa (pp. 175–236). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57742-0_6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57742-0_6

[35]Qin, M., Wang, J., Ding, X., & Zhang, H. (2025). Symmetrical traditional patterns and user perception: A study on innovation in home textile design. Symmetry, 17(6), 960. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/sym17060960

[36]Jiang, C. (2023). Film and television communication in the new media era: Content innovation in the age of short videos. Highlights in Art and Design, 4(3), 164–167. https://doi.org/10.54097/qgxk5l1y DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/qgxk5l1y

[37]Gray, J. (2010). Show sold separately: Promos, spoilers, and other media paratexts. New York, NY: New York University Press