Main Article Content

Authors

Mitiku Alemayehu Emiru

Abstract

Urban land governance is a critical component of effective urban development, particularly in rapidly urbanizing countries like Ethiopia. However,  the increasing demand for urban land, coupled with limited  institutional  capacity,  poses  significant  challenges  to  land  provision  and  administration. Despite these challenges, there is limited research on how Ethiopia can learn from international best practices to strengthen its urban land governance systems. This study addresses this gap by examining the  institutional capacity challenges  in Ethiopia’s urban  land governance and proposing solutions informed by  best practices from  selected Asian  and African  countries.  Employing  a  comparative qualitative approach, the research analyzes case studies from South Korea, Singapore, Kenya, and Ghana  to  extract  lessons  and strategies for  improving  land governance.  The findings  reveal  that Ethiopia’s  urban  land  governance  is  constrained  by  weak  inter-agency  coordination,  insufficient leadership  and  technical  capacity,  and  bureaucratic   inefficiencies,  which  hinder  effective  land management  and  urban  development.  Based  on  these findings,  the  study  concludes  with  policy recommendations for  strengthening  Ethiopia’s  urban   land  governance.   These  include  enhancing institutional coordination through the establishment of inter-agency platforms, investing in technology and human resource capacity, integrating technology into land management processes, fostering active community participation in decision-making, and implementing comprehensive training programs for local  officials.  Additionally,   the  research   emphasizes  the  need for  clear  legal frameworks  and streamlined land registration processes to improve efficiency and transparency. These insights not only contribute  to  Ethiopia’s  urban  development  policies  but  also  provide  a  roadmap for  achieving sustainable  urban  land  administration,  with potential  implications for  other  developing  countries facing similar challenges.

Keywords:
best practices, ethiopia, institutional capacity, policy development, urban land governance

Article Details

References

[1]Emiru, M. A. (2022). Institutional capacity as a barrier to deliver urban land for residential housing development in Ethiopia : The case ofAmhara National Regional State Bahir Dar City. Journal of Land Management and Appraisal The, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5897/JLMA2021

[2]Emiru, M. A., Adam, A. G., & Dadi, T. T. (2023). Exploring institutional capacity of urban land delivery and administration for housing development in Bahir Dar , Ethiopia : Institutional analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 1 22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023

[3]Udessa, F. (2024). Urban land governance : Towards a conceptual framework. 17(September), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP2024.0869

[4]OECD. (2019). The Governance of Land Use in Korea: Urban Regeneration. In Oecd.

[5]Lee, J., & Kim, Y. (2016). Urban land use planning and zoning in South Korea: Legal frameworks and practical implications. Habitat International, 53, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.015

[6]Binder, D. (2019). The Deceptive Allure of Singapore’s Urban Planning to Urban Planners in America. SSRN Electronic Journal, 3(1), 155–190. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483282

[7]Tan, E. (2020). Urban Planning and Sustainable Development in Singapore: A Model for Emerging Economies. Journal of Urban Studies and Planning, 45(3), 212–230.

[8]Kariuki, P. (2019). Land Governance Reforms in Kenya: Addressing Fragmentation and Corruption through Technology and Community Participation. African Journal of Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 2(3), 1-15.

[9]Kasanga, K. (2021). Land Administration Reforms and Customary Land Rights in Ghana: The Promise and the Challenge. In S. Home (Ed.), Land Issues for Urban Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa (pp. 87-104). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64573-2_6

[10]Deininger, K., Ali, D. A., & Alemu, T. (2020). Assessing the Challenges of Urban Land Governance in Ethiopia: The Role of Institutional Coordination and Land Tenure. World Development, 136, 105107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105107

[11]Kim, J., & Lee, Y. (2022). Smart Urban Land Administration: Lessons from South Korea's Integrated Approach. Land Use Policy, 120, 106281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106281

[12]Halleux, J. M., Treffer, M., & Maldague, H. (2021). Polycentricity and multipolarisation of urban outskirts: From polycentric urban region to megapolitan region. Cities, 119, 103390.

[13]Government of Kenya. (2016). The Land Laws (Amendment) Act, 2016. Nairobi: National Council for Law Reporting. Retrieved from https://www.kenyalaw.org

[14]Asiama, K. O., & Bennett, R. M. (2022). Decentralization and Community Participation in Land Administration: Lessons from Ghana's Customary Land Sector. Land Use Policy, 122, 106378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106378

[15]UN-Habitat, (2018). Tracking Progress Towards Inclusive, Safe, Resilient and Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements. SDG 11 Synthesis Report-High Level Political Forum 2018

[16]Tesfaye, A., & Mulugeta, G. (2022). Capacity Gaps in Urban Land Management: Assessing Training Needs for Local Government Officials in Ethiopia. Journal of African Land Policy, 5(2), 89-105.

[17]World Bank. (2019). Ethiopia Urban Land Governance Assessment: Identifying Constraints to Effective Urban Land Management. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org

[18]Cho, M. (2017). Institutional coordination in land use planning: The case of South Korea. Land Use Policy, 61, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.031

[19]Choe, K., & Roberts, B. (2011). Competitive cities in the 21st century: Cluster-based local economic development. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/competitive-cities-21st-century

[20]Otieno, A., & Kameri-Mbote, P. (2023). Participatory Land Governance in Kenya: Enhancing Transparency through Community Engagement. Land Use Policy, 125, 106492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106492