Main Article Content

Authors

Mitiku Alemayehu Emiru

Abstract

Urban land governance is a critical component of effective urban development, particularly in rapidly urbanizing countries like Ethiopia. However,  the increasing demand for urban land, coupled with limited  institutional  capacity,  poses  significant  challenges  to  land  provision  and  administration. Despite these challenges, there is limited research on how Ethiopia can learn from international best practices to strengthen its urban land governance systems. This study addresses this gap by examining the  institutional capacity challenges  in Ethiopia’s urban  land governance and proposing solutions informed by  best practices from  selected Asian  and African  countries.  Employing  a  comparative qualitative approach, the research analyzes case studies from South Korea, Singapore, Kenya, and Ghana  to  extract  lessons  and strategies for  improving  land governance.  The findings  reveal  that Ethiopia’s  urban  land  governance  is  constrained  by  weak  inter-agency  coordination,  insufficient leadership  and  technical  capacity,  and  bureaucratic   inefficiencies,  which  hinder  effective  land management  and  urban  development.  Based  on  these findings,  the  study  concludes  with  policy recommendations for  strengthening  Ethiopia’s  urban   land  governance.   These  include  enhancing institutional coordination through the establishment of inter-agency platforms, investing in technology and human resource capacity, integrating technology into land management processes, fostering active community participation in decision-making, and implementing comprehensive training programs for local  officials.  Additionally,   the  research   emphasizes  the  need for  clear  legal frameworks  and streamlined land registration processes to improve efficiency and transparency. These insights not only contribute  to  Ethiopia’s  urban  development  policies  but  also  provide  a  roadmap for  achieving sustainable  urban  land  administration,  with potential  implications for  other  developing  countries facing similar challenges.

Keywords:
best practices, ethiopia, institutional capacity, policy development, urban land governance

Article Details

References

[1] Alemu, T., & Mekonnen, D. (2020). Capacity Challenges in Ethiopian Urban Land Governance: The Need for Institutional Reform. Ethiopian Journal of Urban Planning, 12(2), 45-63.

[2] Ahmed, A. (2020). "Urban Land Administration and Development in Ethiopia: Challenges and Opportunities." International Journal of Urban Studies, 34(2), 101-116.

[3] Binder, D. (2019). The Deceptive Allure of Singapore’s Urban Planning to Urban Planners in America. SSRN Electronic Journal, 3(1), 155–190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3483282

[4] Chin, H.C. and Lee, S. (2019). Land Governance in Singapore: An Integrated Approach to Urban Planning and Transportation. Journal of Urban Policy, 48(2), 127-141.

[5] Deininger, K. (2017). Land Policy for Growth and Poverty Reduction. Oxford University Press.

[6] Emiru, M. A. (2022). Institutional capacity as a barrier to deliver urban land for residential housing development in Ethiopia : The case ofAmhara National Regional State Bahir Dar City. Journal of Land Management and Appraisal The, 9(1), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5897/JLMA2021.00xx

[7] Emiru, M. A., Adam, A. G., & Dadi, T. T. (2023). Exploring institutional capacity of urban land delivery and administration for housing development in Bahir Dar , Ethiopia : Institutional

analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 1–22.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2278208

[8] Gebremedhin, M. (2020). Bureaucratic Inefficiencies in Ethiopian Land Registration Systems. Journal of Ethiopian Public Administration, 24(1), 32-47.

[9] Jung, Y., & Lee, H. (2020). Urban Land Governance in South Korea: Institutional Coordination and Legal Frameworks. Korean Journal of Urban Studies, 58(4), 118-134.

[10] Kim, N.-R., Hong, S.-G., & Lee, S.-J. (2017). Plans for Solving the Problems of Residents of

[11] Gamcheon Culture Village with Design Thinking. International Journal of U- and e- Service, Science and Technology, 10(6), 115–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14257/ijunesst.2017.10.6.11

[12] Kim, Y. jung. (2021). Public–private Partnerships for Urban Projects: A Korean Case of Partnership Failure. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(6), 499–510.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1867574

[13] Low, L. (2017). Urban Sustainability in Singapore: Integrating Land Use and Transportation Planning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 125-135.

[14] Ministry of Urban Development and Housing. (2020). National Urban Development Policy. Addis Ababa: Government of Ethiopia.

[15] Mutisya, E. (2021). Kenya’s Land Use and Management Act: Towards Transparency and

[16] Accountability in Urban Land Governance. African Journal of Urban Planning, 16(2), 25-40.

[17] Nkhoma, M., & Asante, F. (2019). "Land Administration Reform in Ghana: Lessons for Africa." African Journal of Land Administration, 6(1), 45-59.

[18] OECD. (2019). The Governance of Land Use in Korea: Urban Regeneration. In Oecd.

https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/ded0e64c-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/ded0e64c-en

[19] Tadesse, M. (2021). Urban Land Governance in Ethiopia: Challenges and Institutional Capacity Building. Ethiopian Journal of Development Studies, 19(3), 103-115.

[20] Tetteh, D. (2020). Decentralized Land Administration in Ghana: Community Participation and Transparency. International Journal of Land Management, 12(3), 88-103.

[21] Udessa, F. (2024). Urban land governance : Towards a conceptual framework. 17(September), 46–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP2024.0869.

[22] World Bank. (2018). The Role of Institutions in Land Governance: Case Studies from Africa and Asia.World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 8547.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.