Main Article Content

Authors

Jie Zhang

Abstract

The rapid diminution of Arctic sea ice, a direct consequence of climate change, is fundamentally altering the region’s geopolitical and environmental landscape, transforming it from a remote periphery into a nexus of global interest. This paper critically analyzes the inherent tensions between the burgeoning economic opportunities and the profound environmental risks associated with this new accessibility. We assess the dual drivers of development: the extraction of the Arctic’s substantial hydrocarbon and mineral endowments—estimated by the U.S. Geological Survey to constitute 13% of the world’s undiscovered oil and 30% of its natural gas—and the commercial viability of emerging trans-Arctic shipping lanes like the Northern Sea Route (NSR). Our analysis posits that while these prospects promise considerable economic gains, a trajectory of unregulated exploitation poses an imminent threat of irreversible ecological degradation, including habitat fragmentation for keystone species such as the polar bear and the exacerbation of ocean acidification. The study concludes that a paradigm shift towards sustainable governance is imperative. This requires robust international cooperation, primarily through established bodies like the Arctic Council, and must be underpinned by the integration of indigenous knowledge systems and the adoption of green technologies. Ultimately, we argue that a balanced framework, which prioritizes environmental stewardship, respects indigenous sovereignty, and ensures equitable resource management, is the only viable path to harnessing the Arctic’s potential without compromising its global ecological significance.

Keywords:
arctic development, climate change, resource exploitation, northern sea route, sustainable development, International cooperation

Article Details

References

[1]Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Sixth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2023. Geneva: IPCC.

[2]National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2024). Arctic Sea Ice Report 2024. Washington, DC: NOAA.

[3]Russian Ministry of Transport. (2022). Northern Sea Route: Development Strategy 2022-2035. Moscow: Russian Ministry of Transport.

[4]U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2021). Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in the Arctic. Reston: USGS.

[5]Novatek. (2023). Yamal LNG: Annual Production Report 2023. Moscow: Novatek.

[6]Equinor. (2024). Johan Castberg Oil Field: Project Update. Oslo: Equinor.

[7]Greenland Minerals. (2022). Kvanefjeld Rare Earth Project: Feasibility Study. Nuuk: Greenland Minerals.

[8]Arctic Institute. (2024). Northern Sea Route Transit Report 2023. Washington, DC: Arctic Institute.

[9]International Chamber of Shipping. (2023). The Economic Benefits of Arctic Shipping Routes. London: International Chamber of Shipping.

[10]Rosatom. (2023). Arctic Nuclear Icebreaker Fleet: Modernization and Expansion. Moscow: Rosatom.

[11]Arctic Council. (2022). Environmental Risks of Offshore Oil and Gas Activities in the Arctic. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.

[12]U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (2023). Polar Bear Conservation Assessment 2023. Anchorage: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

[13]NOAA Ocean Acidification Program. (2024). Ocean Acidification in the Arctic: Current Status and Future Projections. Seattle: NOAA.

[14]United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). (2021). Report of the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: Russian Federation. New York: UNCLOS.

[15]Arctic Council. (2011). Agreement on Cooperation on Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue in the Arctic. Retrieved from https://www.arctic-council.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/SAR-Agreement-English.pdf

[16]Alaska Native Science Commission. (2022). Indigenous Perspectives on Arctic Oil Development. Anchorage: Alaska Native Science Commission.

[17]Inuit Circumpolar Council. (2023). Indigenous Participation in Arctic Development: A Survey of Inuit Communities. Copenhagen: Inuit Circumpolar Council.

[18]International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2022). Polar Code: Safety and Environmental Protection for Ships Operating in Polar Waters. London: IMO.

[19]Equinor. (2023). Sleipner Carbon Capture and Storage: 25 Years of Experience. Oslo: Equinor.

[20]Wärtsilä. (2024). Hybrid Propulsion Systems for Arctic Icebreakers. Helsinki: Wärtsilä.

[21]Sami Parliament of Norway. (2023). Sami Participation in Arctic Energy Projects: Case Studies. Karasjok: Sami Parliament of Norway.

[22]Government of Canada. (2022). Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit: Integrating Traditional Knowledge into Arctic Policy. Ottawa: Government of Canada.