Main Article Content

Authors

Diana Saadi

Abstract

Parental stress is increasingly understood as a multidimensional phenomenon shaped not only by psychological and socioeconomic factors but also by the physical environments in which everyday parenting occurs. However, empirical evidence linking near-home greenery, objectively measured environmental stressors, and parental stress remains limited, particularly in environmentally underserved communities. This mixed-methods field study, conducted in Arab residential towns and neighbourhoods in Israel, examines how residential vegetation density influences emotional and parental stress and whether reductions in environmental stressors constitute key underlying mechanisms. The study included 147 participants who completed all study components. Data were collected during the summer months (May–October 2024). Near-home greenery was quantified using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Environmental stressors (noise, carbon monoxide concentration, and thermal load) were measured in situ during walking interviews conducted around participants’ homes. Emotional stress and parental functioning were assessed using validated questionnaires, and qualitative interviews captured lived experiences of environmental stress and restoration. Higher NDVI levels were associated with lower noise exposure, reduced air pollution, and attenuated thermal load. Parents living in greener environments reported lower emotional stress and higher perceived parenting competence, with emotional stress mediating the effects of environmental quality on parental outcomes. Qualitative findings showed that near-home greenery supports everyday emotional regulation through shade, quiet, and micro-restorative encounters, while parents in vegetation-poor areas actively created greenery as a coping strategy. These findings demonstrate that living in greener residential environments reduces parental stress through measurable environmental pathways and lived experience, highlighting near-home greenery as a critical public health and planning resource.

Keywords:
near-home greenery, parental stress, emotional stress, environmental stressors, NDVI, walking interviews, environmental monitoring, urban environmental inequality

Article Details

References

[1]Saadi D, Emanuel T, Keren AS, Schnell I. Ethnic differences in home-related maternal stress: Muslim and Jewish mothers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(22):4393.

[2]Saadi D, Tirosh E, Schnell I. Social vs. physical environmental nuisances and their impact on stress among Jewish and Muslim women in Israel. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;763:144474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144474

[3]Schnell I, Hijazi B, Saadi D, Tirosh E. Women’s emotional, cognitive, and physiological coping with daily urban environments: A pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(13):8190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138190

[4]Saadi D. Greenery as a cross-gender buffer of parental stress in Arab families: A multidimensional ecological, psychophysiological analysis. Urban-Regional Ecology. 2025;1(1):50–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65773/ure.1.1.67

[5]Hijazi B, Tirosh E, Chudnovsky A, Saadi D, Schnell I. Short-term adaptation of the autonomic nervous system by type of urban environment and ethnicity. Environmental Research. 2023;218:114929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114929

[6]Evans GW, Cohen S. Environmental stress. In: Stokols D, Altman I, editors. Handbook of Environmental Psychology. New York: Wiley; 1987. p. 571–610.

[7]Evans GW. Environmental stressors. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1983;3:89–101.

[8]Saadi D, Agay-Shay K, Tirosh E, Schnell I. The effects of mono-ethnic urban environments on autonomic functions among Muslim and Jewish women in Israel. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2018;190(11):627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7000-0

[9]Zhang Y, Van den Bosch M, Malik A, Jalaludin B, Mavoa S. Associations between neighborhood greenery, heat exposure, and mental well-being in dense urban environments. Environment International. 2023;172:107762

[10]Saadi D, Schnell I, Tirosh E, Basagaña X, Agay-Shay K. There’s no place like home? The psychological, physiological, and cognitive effects of short visits to outdoor urban environments compared to staying in the indoor home environment. Environmental Research. 2020;187:109687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109687

[11]Ulrich RS. Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF, editors. Behavior and the Natural Environment. Boston: Springer; 1983. p. 85–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4

[12]Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1991;11(3):201–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7

[13]Saadi D, Emanuel T, Keren AS, Schnell I. Ethnic differences in home-related maternal stress: Muslim and Jewish mothers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(22):4393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224393

[14]Kaplan R, Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.

[15]Kaplan S. The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 1995;15(3):169–182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2

[16]Pearlin LI, Schooler C. The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1978;19(1):2–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2136319

[17]Johnston C, Mash EJ. A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy: The Parenting Sense of Competence scale. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1989;18(2):167–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8

[18]Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. In: Proceedings of the Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symposium. Washington, DC: NASA; 1974. p. 309–317.

[19]Tucker CJ. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sensing of Environment. 1979;8(2):127–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(79)90013-0

[20]Kusenbach M. Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography. 2003;4(3):455–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007

[21]Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[22]Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173