Organization of Psychosocial Processes in Metropolitan and Non-Metropolitan Regions

Article Sidebar

PDF

Section

Research Articles

Issue

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025): In Progress

How to Cite

Assari, S., & Pallera, J. A. (2025). Organization of Psychosocial Processes in Metropolitan and Non-Metropolitan Regions. Urban-Regional Ecology, 1(1), 37-49. https://journals.explorerpress.com/index.php/ure/article/view/68

Main Article Content

Authors

Shervin Assari*
Department of Psychiatry, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
John Ashley Pallera
College of Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Background: Adolescents’ social, emotional, and behavioral characteristics do not operate in isolation but form interconnected systems that shape well-being. These processes may differ across geographic settings, particularly between metropolitan (MSA) and non-metropolitan (non-MSA) environments, which vary in social norms, community resources, and daily experiences. However, little research has examined how these psychosocial factors are organized as part of a broader system in different environments. Objectives: This study compared the structure of psychosocial networks among adolescents living in MSA and non-MSA settings. We aimed to identify whether social, emotional, and behavioral constructs cluster differently across environments and whether specific constructs show stronger influence or bridging roles within each network. Methods: Data were drawn from the 2023 Monitoring the Future survey of U.S. adolescents. Twelve psychosocial and behavioral constructs were examined, including emotional distress, self-esteem, positive well-being, social connectedness, sensation seeking, boredom, problem behaviors, and perceived parental and peer disapproval of substance use, and substance use. Separate correlation-based networks were generated for MSA and non-MSA youth. System-level measures (average degree, betweenness, eigenvector centrality) were used to assess overall structure, and node-level metrics identified constructs serving as central or bridging elements within each network. Results: Emotional distress, sensation seeking, and problem behaviors played stronger bridging roles in non-MSA than MSA environments. In contrast, MSA networks were more evenly distributed, with positive well-being, social connectedness, and parental or peer disapproval showing stronger central influence. Conclusions: Different organization of psychosocial processes across environments can inform context-sensitive strategies to support adolescent well-being.

Keywords:
adolescence, psychosocial factors, emotional well-being, social connectedness

Article Details

References

[1]Aoki, C.; Romeo, R.D.; Smith, S.S. Adolescence as a Critical Period for Developmental Plasticity. Brain Res 2017, 1654, 85-86, https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2016.11.026.

[2]Bernheim, A.; Halfon, O.; Boutrel, B. Controversies about the enhanced vulnerability of the adolescent brain to develop addiction. Front Pharmacol 2013, 4, 118, https://orcid.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00118.

[3]Chen, G.; Zhou, Z.; Shek, D.T.; Zhu, X. The Network Structure of Positive Youth Development Attributes Among Chinese Rural Adolescents. Applied Research in Quality of Life 2025, 1-20.

[4]Demetriou, A.; Kazi, S.; Makris, N.; Spanoudis, G. Cognitive ability, cognitive self-awareness, and school performance: From childhood to adolescence. Intelligence 2020, 79, 101432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101432.

[5]Fergus, S.; Zimmerman, M.A. Adolescent resilience: a framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annu Rev Public Health 2005, 26, 399-419, https://orcid.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357.

[6]Fuhrmann, D.; Knoll, L.J.; Blakemore, S.-J. Adolescence as a sensitive period of brain development. Trends in cognitive sciences 2015, 19, 558-566.

[7]Williams, W.M.; Ceci, S.J. A person–process–context–time approach to understanding intellectual development. Review of General Psychology 1997, 1, 288-310.

[8]Willen, S.S.; Knipper, M.; Abadía-Barrero, C.E.; Davidovitch, N. Syndemic vulnerability and the right to health. The Lancet 2017, 389, 964-977.

[9]Adinkrah, E.; Najand, B.; Young-Brinn, A.; Salimi, S. Association between School Achievement and Tobacco Susceptibility among US Adolescents: Ethnic Differences. Children 2023, 10, 327.

[10]Krishnan, V. Early child development: A conceptual model. In Proceedings of early childhood council annual conference; pp. 1-17.

[11]Bronfenbrenner, U. The context of development and the development of context. In Developmental psychology, Routledge: 2019; pp. 147-184.

[12]Black, M.; Barnes, A.; Strong, M.; Brook, A.; Ray, A.; Holden, B.; Foster, C.; Taylor-Robinson, D. Relationships between child development at school entry and adolescent health—a participatory systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health 2021, 18, 11613.

[13]Cole, D.A.; Maxwell, S.E.; Martin, J.M.; Peeke, L.G.; Seroczynski, A.D.; Tram, J.M.; Hoffman, K.B.; Ruiz, M.D.; Jacquez, F.; Maschman, T. The development of multiple domains of child and adolescent self‐concept: A cohort sequential longitudinal design. Child development 2001, 72, 1723-1746.

[14]Masten, A.S.; Coatsworth, J.D.; Neemann, J.; Gest, S.D.; Tellegen, A.; Garmezy, N. The structure and coherence of competence from childhood through adolescence. Child development 1995, 66, 1635-1659.

[15]Smetana, J.G.; Campione-Barr, N.; Metzger, A. Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2006, 57, 255-284.

[16]Bray, R.M. Drug use in metropolitan America; Sage publications: 1998.

[17]Cooper, H.; Friedman, S.R.; Tempalski, B.; Friedman, R.; Keem, M. Racial/ethnic disparities in injection drug use in large US metropolitan areas. Annals of epidemiology 2005, 15, 326-334.

[18]Roberts, E.T.; Friedman, S.R.; Brady, J.E.; Pouget, E.R.; Tempalski, B.; Galea, S. Environmental conditions, political economy, and rates of injection drug use in large US metropolitan areas 1992–2002. Drug and alcohol dependence 2010, 106, 142-153.

[19]Assari, S. Parental Education and Children's Sleep Disturbance: Minorities' Diminished Returns. Int J Epidemiol Res 2021, 8, 31-39.

[20]Assari, S.; Mardani, A.; Maleki, M.; Boyce, S.; Bazargan, M. Black-White Achievement Gap: Role of Race, School Urbanity, and Parental Education. Pediatric Health Med Ther 2021, 12, 1-11, https://orcid.org/10.2147/PHMT.S238877.

[21]Boyce, S.; Bazargan, M.; Caldwell, C.H.; Zimmerman, M.A.; Assari, S. Parental Educational Attainment and Social Environmental of Urban Public Schools in the U.S.: Blacks' Diminished Returns. Children (Basel) 2020, 7, https://orcid.org/10.3390/children7050044.

[22]Fishbein, D.H.; Herman-Stahl, M.; Eldreth, D.; Paschall, M.J.; Hyde, C.; Hubal, R.; Hubbard, S.; Williams, J.; Ialongo, N. Mediators of the stress–substance–use relationship in urban male adolescents. Prevention Science 2006, 7, 113-126.

[23]Friel, S.; Akerman, M.; Hancock, T.; Kumaresan, J.; Marmot, M.; Melin, T.; Vlahov, D.; members, G. Addressing the social and environmental determinants of urban health equity: evidence for action and a research agenda. J Urban Health 2011, 88, 860-874, https://orcid.org/10.1007/s11524-011-9606-1.

[24]Gibbons, F.X.; Reimer, R.A.; Gerrard, M.; Yeh, H.C.; Houlihan, A.E.; Cutrona, C.; Simons, R.; Brody, G. Rural-urban differences in substance use among African-American adolescents. J Rural Health 2007, 23 Suppl, 22-28, https://orcid.org/10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00120.x.

[25]Gordon, W.R.; Caltabiano, M.L. Urban-rural differences in adolescent self-esteem, leisure boredom, and sensation-seeking as predictors of leisure-time usage and satisfaction. Adolescence 1996, 31, 883.

[26]Monnat, S.M.; Rigg, K.K. Examining Rural/Urban Differences in Prescription Opioid Misuse Among US Adolescents. J Rural Health 2016, 32, 204-218, https://orcid.org/10.1111/jrh.12141.

[27]Warren, J.C.; Smalley, K.B.; Barefoot, K.N. Perceived ease of access to alcohol, tobacco and other substances in rural and urban US students. Rural Remote Health 2015, 15, 3397.

[28]Wight, R.G.; Aneshensel, C.S.; Miller-Martinez, D.; Botticello, A.L.; Cummings, J.R.; Karlamangla, A.S.; Seeman, T.E. Urban neighborhood context, educational attainment, and cognitive function among older adults. American journal of epidemiology 2006, 163, 1071-1078.

[29]Huang, S.; Hou, J.; Sun, L.; Dou, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H. The Effects of Objective and Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Subjective Well-Being among Rural-to-Urban Migrants in China: The Moderating Role of Subjective Social Mobility. Front Psychol 2017, 8, 819, https://orcid.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00819.

[30]Noland, M.; Rayens, M.K.; Wiggins, A.T.; Huntington-Moskos, L.; Rayens, E.A.; Howard, T.; Hahn, E.J. Current use of e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes among US high school students in urban and rural locations: 2014 National Youth Tobacco Survey. American Journal of Health Promotion 2018, 32, 1239-1247.

[31]Rhew, I.C.; David Hawkins, J.; Oesterle, S. Drug use and risk among youth in different rural contexts. Health Place 2011, 17, 775-783, https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.02.003.

[32]Roscigno, V.J.; Crowle, M.L. Rurality, institutional disadvantage, and achievement/attainment. Rural sociology 2001, 66, 268-292.

[33]Wagner, F.; Diaz, D.B.; López, A.L.; Collado, M.E.; Aldaz, E. Social cohesion, cultural identity, and drug use in Mexican rural communities. Substance use & misuse 2002, 37, 715-747.

[34]Probst, J.C.; Barker, J.C.; Enders, A.; Gardiner, P. Current state of child health in rural America: how context shapes children's health. The Journal of Rural Health 2018, 34, s3-s12.

[35]Hermida, M.J.; Shalom, D.E.; Segretin, M.S.; Goldin, A.P.; Abril, M.C.; Lipina, S.J.; Sigman, M. Risks for child cognitive development in rural contexts. Frontiers in psychology 2019, 9, 2735.

[36]Tutzauer, F. Entropy as a measure of centrality in networks characterized by path-transfer flow. Social networks 2007, 29, 249-265.

[37]Wasil, A.R.; Venturo-Conerly, K.E.; Shinde, S.; Patel, V.; Jones, P.J. Applying network analysis to understand depression and substance use in Indian adolescents. J Affect Disord 2020, 265, 278-286, https://orcid.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.025.

[38]Zhang, J.; Luo, Y. Degree centrality, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality in social network. In Proceedings of 2017 2nd international conference on modelling, simulation and applied mathematics (MSAM2017); pp. 300-303.

[39]Zhang, Q.; Li, M.; Deng, Y. Measure the structure similarity of nodes in complex networks based on relative entropy. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 2018, 491, 749-763.

[40]Johnston, L.; O'Malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G. Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975-2000; National Institute on Drug Abuse, US Department of Health and Human Services …: 2001; Vol. 1.

[41]Johnston, L.D.; Miech, R.A.; Patrick, M.E.; O'Malley, P.M.; Schulenberg, J.E.; Bachman, J.G. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2022: Overview, Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use. Institute for Social Research 2023.

[42]Johnston, L.D.; O'Malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G.; Schulenberg, J.E. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2010. Volume I, Secondary School Students. Institute for Social Research 2011.

[43]Johnston, L.D.; O'Malley, P.M.; Miech, R.A.; Bachman, J.G.; Schulenberg, J.E. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2016: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. 2017.

[44]Johnston, L.D.; O’Malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G. Monitoring the future: National results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings. Focus 2003, 1, 213-234.

[45]Johnston, L.D.; O’Malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G.; Schulenberg, J.E.; Miech, R.A. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2013: Volume I, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan: 2014.

[46]Miech, R.A., Johnston, Lloyd D., and Patrick, Megan E. . Monitoring the Future: A Continuing Study of American Youth (8th- and 10th-Grade Surveys), 2023. . Availabe online: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR39171.v1 (accessed on

[47]Miech, R.A.; Johnston, L.D.; O'malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G.; Schulenberg, J.E. Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2014. Volume 1, Secondary School Students. Institute for Social Research 2015.

[48]Miech, R.A.; Johnston, L.D.; O’Malley, P.M.; Bachman, J.G.; Schulenberg, J.E. Monitoring the Future national survey results on drug use, 1975-2015: Volume I, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan: 2016.

[49]Witherspoon, D.P.; White, R.M.B.; Bámaca, M.Y.; Browning, C.R.; Leech, T.G.J.; Leventhal, T.; Matthews, S.A.; Pinchak, N.; Roy, A.L.; Sugie, N.; Winkler, E.N. Place-Based Developmental Research: Conceptual and Methodological Advances in Studying Youth Development in Context. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 2023, 88, 7-130, https://orcid.org/10.1111/mono.12472.

[50]Boardman, J.D.; Saint Onge, J.M. Neighborhoods and Adolescent Development. Child Youth Environ 2005, 15, 138-164.

[51]Pettigrew, J.; Miller-Day, M.; Krieger, J.; Hecht, M.L. The Rural Context of Illicit Substance Offers: A Study of Appalachian Rural Adolescents. J Adolesc Res 2012, 27, 523-550, https://orcid.org/10.1177/0743558411432639.

[52]Warren, J.C.; Smalley, K.B.; Barefoot, K.N. Recent Alcohol, Tobacco, and Substance Use Variations between Rural and Urban Middle and High School Students. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse 2017, 26, 60-65, https://orcid.org/10.1080/1067828x.2016.1210550.

[53]Assari, S.; Assari, G.; Zare, H. Weaker Effects of Parental Education on Oral Nicotine Use of High School Students in Rural Areas: Marginalization-Related Diminished Returns. Open J Educ Res 2025, 5, https://orcid.org/10.31586/ojer.2025.6042.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.