Challenges and Opportunities in Unlocking the Potential of Citizen Science in Zambia: A Review

Christopher Mulwanda; Maggie Mapalo Mwape; Mainess Kandah Namuchile

doi:10.65773/see.1.1.86

View PDF

Information Fusion

Article Type: Review Article

Issue: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)

Published: 30 November 2025

Pages: 35-45

How to Cite

Mulwanda, C., Mwape, M. M., & Namuchile, M. K. (2025). Challenges and Opportunities in Unlocking the Potential of Citizen Science in Zambia: A Review. Synthetic Ecological Engineering, 1(1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.65773/see.1.1.86

Authors

Christopher Mulwanda ¹ ^*

,

Maggie Mapalo Mwape ¹

,

Mainess Kandah Namuchile ²

¹ Centre for Environmental Justice, Plot 37741, Pitta Road, Off Twin-Palm Road, Ibex Hill, Lusaka, Zambia

² Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering and Technology, Mulungushi University,Zambia

Abstract

Citizen science has emerged as a practical approach for generating large-scale environmental data and engaging communities in conservation. Globally, it has been integrated into biodiversity monitoring programs, particularly in developed countries, where it addresses data gaps and informs policy. In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), and Zambia specifically, adoption remains limited despite its potential to tackle biodiversity loss, such as pollinator decline. This paper explores the benefits of citizen science, the barriers hindering its implementation in Zambia and SSA in general, and opportunities for scaling it up. Key challenges include low public awareness, inadequate digital infrastructure, socio-economic constraints, and weak institutional frameworks. However, opportunities exist to leverage mobile technologies, foster partnerships among government agencies, NGOs, and academic institutions, and implement targeted capacity-building programs. Case studies from SSA, such as bird atlas projects and iNaturalist initiatives, demonstrate the feasibility and impact of citizen science when supported by robust protocols and community engagement. The paper concludes by proposing a roadmap for Zambia that emphasizes integration into national biodiversity strategies, investment in digital inclusion, and multi-stakeholder collaboration. Addressing these gaps can position citizen science as a transformative tool for biodiversity monitoring, conservation, and sustainable development across in Zambia.

Keywords:

Citizen science, biodiversity monitoring, policy integration, community engagement, Sub-Saharan Africa, Zambia

References

[1]Serret, H., Deguines, N., Jang, Y., Lois, G., & Julliard, R. (2019). Data quality and participant engagement in citizen science: Comparing two approaches for monitoring pollinators in France and South Korea. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), Article 22, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.200

[2]Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2016). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515607406

[3]Acorn, J. H. (2017). Entomological citizen science in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 149(6), 774–785. https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2017.48

[4]Theobald, E. J., Ettinger, A. K., Burgess, H. K., DeBey, L. B., Schmidt, N. R., Froehlich, H. E., Wagner, C., HilleRisLambers, J., Tewksbury, J., & Parrish, J. K. (2015). Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021

[5]Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., & Purcell, K. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1890/110236

[6]Pocock, M. J. O., Chandler, M., Bonney, R., Thornhill, I., Albin, A., August, T., Bachman, S., Brown, P. M. J., Cunha, D. G. F., Grez, A., Jackson, C., Peters, M., Rabarijaon, N. R., Roy, H. E., Zaviezo, T., & Danielsen, F. (2018). A vision for global biodiversity monitoring with citizen science. In D. A. Bohan, A. J. Dumbrell, G. Woodward, & M. Jackson (Eds.), Advances in ecological research (Vol. 59, pp. 169–223). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2018.06.003

[7]Beck, S., Fraisl, D., Poetz, M., & Sauermann, H. (2024). Multi-disciplinary perspectives on citizen science: Synthesizing five paradigms of citizen involvement. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 9(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.691

[8]Deguines, N., Princé, K., Prévot, A.-C., & Fontaine, B. (2020). Assessing the emergence of pro-biodiversity practices in citizen scientists of a backyard butterfly survey. Science of the Total Environment, 716, Article 136842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136842

[9]Wepprich, T., Adrion, J. R., Ries, L., Wiedmann, J., & Haddad, N. M. (2019). Butterfly abundance declines over 20 years of systematic monitoring in Ohio, USA. PLOS ONE, 14(7), Article e0216270. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216270

[10]Fox, R., Oliver, T. H., Harrower, C., Parsons, M. S., Thomas, C. D., & Roy, D. B. (2014). Long-term changes to the frequency of occurrence of British moths are consistent with opposing and synergistic effects of climate and land-use changes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(4), 949–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12256

[11]Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. (2016). Summary for policymakers of the assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2616458

[12]Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., & Shirk, J. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience, 59(11), 977–984. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9

[13]Ollerton, J., Winfree, R., & Tarrant, S. (2011). How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos, 120(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x

[14]Danielsen, F., Jensen, P. M., Burgess, N. D., Altamirano, R., Alviola, P. A., Andrianandrasana, H., Brashares, J. S., Burton, A. C., Coronado, I., Corpuz, N., Enghoff, M., Fjeldså, J., Funder, M., Holt, S., Hübertz, H., Jensen, A. E., Lewis, R., Massao, J., Mendoza, M. M., Ngaga, Y., Pipper, C. B., Poulsen, M. K., Rueda, R. M., Sam, M., Skielboe, T., Sørensen, M., & Young, R. (2014). A multi-country assessment of tropical resource monitoring by local communities. BioScience, 64(3), 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu001

[15]McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S. C., Evans, D. M., French, R. A., Parrish, J. K., Phillips, T. B., Ryan, S. F., Shanley, L. A., Shirk, J. L., Stepenuck, K. F., Weltzin, J. F., Wiggins, A., Boyle, O. D., Briggs, R. D., Chapin, S. F., Hewitt, D. A., Preuss, P. W., Soukup, M. A. (2017). Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.015

[16]Grady, M., O’Hare, G., Ties, S., & Williams, J. (2021). The citizen observatory: Enabling next generation citizen science. Business Systems Research Journal, 12(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2021-0029

[17]Elias, P., Shonowo, A., de Sherbinin, A., Hultquist, C., Danielsen, F., Cooper, C., Mondardini, M., Faustman, E., Browser, A., Minster, J.-B. M., van Deventer, M., & Popescu, I. (2023). Mapping the landscape of citizen science in Africa: Assessing its potential contributions to Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 11 on access to clean water and sanitation and sustainable cities. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), Article 33. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.601

[18]Ceccaroni, L., Parkinson, S., Woods, S., Sprinks, J., Wehn, U., Scrieciu, A., Kozak, B., Gumiero, B., Joyce, H., Naura, M., Janes, M., & Williams, C. (2022). The impact of citizen science on society, governance, the economy, the environment and science (MICS Deliverable 5.6). MICS Project. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7124259

[19]Suzuki, T. (2024). Citizen science as a mainstream approach for biodiversity monitoring. Ecological Indicators, 160: 107 - 123.

[20]Della Rocca, F., Musiani, M., Galaverni, M., & Milanesi, P. (2024). Improving online citizen science platforms for biodiversity monitoring. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.15000

[21]Brown, J., & Liu, Y. (2021). Citizen science as a pathway for environmental education and engagement. Environmental Education Research, 27(4), 567–583.

[22]von Gönner, J., Herrmann, T. M., Bruckermann, T., et al. (2023). Citizen science’s transformative impact on science, citizen empowerment and socio-political processes. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 5, 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42532-022-00136-4

[23]Roche, J., Bell, L., Galvão, C., Golumbic, Y. N., Kloetzer, L., Knoben, N., Laakso, M., Lorke, J., Mannion, G., Massetti, L., Mauchline, A., Pata, K., Ruck, A., Taraba, P., & Winter, S. (2020). Citizen science, education, and learning: Challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, Article 613814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.613814

[24]Caballero, B. A. (2025). Citizen science and equity: Bridging gaps in knowledge production. Journal of Science Communication, 24(2), 1–12.

[25]Benyei, P., Skarlatidou, A., Argyriou, D., Hall, R., Theilade, I., Turreira-García, N., Latreche, D., Albert, A., Berger, D., Cartró-Sabaté, M., Chang, J., Chiaravalloti, R. M., Cortesi, A., Danielsen, F., Haklay, M., Jacobi, E., Nigussie, A., Reyes-García, V., Rodrigues, E., Sauini, T., Shadrin, V., Siqueira, A., Supriadi, M., Tillah, M., Tofighi-Niaki, A., Vronski, N., & Woods, T. (2023). Challenges, strategies, and impacts of doing citizen science with marginalised and Indigenous communities: Reflections from project coordinators. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 8(1), Article 21, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.514

[26]de Sherbinin, A., Bowser, A., Chuang, T.-R., Cooper, C., Danielsen, F., Edmunds, R., Elias, P., Faustman, E., Hultquist, C., Mondardini, R., Popescu, I., Shonowo, A., & Sivakumar, K. (2021). The critical importance of citizen science data. Frontiers in Climate, 3, Article 650760. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.650760

[27]Roche, J., Bell, L., Galvão, C., Golumbic, Y. N., Kloetzer, L., Knoben, N., … Winter, S. (2020). Citizen Science, Education, and Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 613814. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.613814

[28]Mwelwa, J., Boulton, G., Wafula, J. M., & Loucoubar, C. (2020). Developing open science in Africa: Barriers, solutions and opportunities. Data Science Journal, 19(1), Article 31, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-031

[29]da Corta, L., & Bwalya, R. (2025). Rural pathways out of poverty in Zambia. Chronic Poverty Advisory Network. https://www.chronicpovertynetwork.org/resources/2025/7/28/rural-pathways-out-of-poverty-in-zambia

[30]Khozi, M. (2024, April 3). Breaking digital barriers: The role of ICTs in empowering rural women and girls. UNDP Zambia. https://www.undp.org/zambia/stories/breaking-digital-barriers-role-icts-empowering-rural-women-and-girls

[31]Burgess, H. K., DeBey, L. B., Froehlich, H. E., Schmidt, N., Theobald, E. J., Ettinger, A. K., HilleRisLambers, J., Tewksbury, J. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2017). The science of citizen science: Exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biological Conservation, 208, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.014

[32]Simungala, G. (2024). Critical insights into language policy and planning in Zambia. In The Palgrave handbook of language policies in Africa (pp. 665–682). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57308-8_31

[33]Chomba, M. J., & Nkhata, B. A. (2016). Property rights and benefit sharing: A case study of the Barotse floodplain of Zambia. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.600

[34]GSMA Intelligence. (2024, November 7). The mobile economy Sub-Saharan Africa 2024. GSMA. https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-economy/sub-saharan-africa-2024/

[35]Fourie-Basson, W. (2024, May 29). 21st-century technology can boost Africa’s contribution to global biodiversity data. Nature Africa. https://www.nature.com/articles/d44148-024-00166-y

[36]Leeuwis, C., et al. (2018). Digital platforms and the future of citizen engagement in science. Agricultural Systems, 165, 200–208.

[37]Golumbic, Y. N., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Fishbain, B. (2017). Engagement styles in an environmental citizen science project. Journal of Science Communication, 16(3), Article A03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.16030203

[38]Cambridge Conservation Initiative. (2018). Citizen science for conservation in Africa (CISCA). https://www.cambridgeconservation.org/project/citizen-science-for-conservation-in-africa-cisca/

[39]Jansen, M., Beukes, M., Weiland, C., Blumer, M., Rudolfi, M., Poerting, J., Meißner, R., Weiß, M., Condori, Y., Aramayo-Ledezma, G., Grieb, J., Wolodkin, A., & Aramayo-Bejarano, J. L. (2024). Engaging citizen scientists in biodiversity monitoring: Insights from the WildLIVE! Project. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 9(1), Article 6, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.665

[40]Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41, 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636

[41]Finger, L., van den Bogaert, V., Schmidt, L., Fleischer, J., Stadtler, M., Sommer, K., & Wirth, J. (2023). The science of citizen science: A systematic literature review on educational and scientific outcomes. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1226529. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1226529

[42]Pocock, M. J. O., August, T., Fox, R., & Logie, M. (2019). The information content of biodiversity datasets is affected by patterns of citizen science participation both between and within projects. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3, e38435. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.3.38435

[43]Mason, B. M., Bratton, R., Crandall, C., Hochmair, H. H., Mallinak, A., Suarez, E., Tatem, S., & Callaghan, C. T. (2025). Quantifying the use of citizen science as a tool for biodiversity management and engagement. Conservation Science and Practice, 7(10), e70141. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70141

[44]Pateman, R. M., Wikman, A., Archer, D., Denduang, B., Dyke, A., Mehta, V. K., Muhoza, C., Otieno Opiyo, R., West, S. E., & Cinderby, S. (2025). Co-created citizen science creates space for dialogue around environmental challenges faced by urban residents in the global South. Journal of Participatory Research Methods, 6(1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.128165

[45]Suter, S., Barrett, B., & Welden, N. (2023). Do biodiversity monitoring citizen science surveys meet the core principles of open science practices? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195, Article 295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10887-y

[46]Wehn, U., Gharesifard, M., Ceccaroni, L., Joyce, H., Ajates, R., Woods, S., Bilbao, A., Parkinson, S., Gold, M., & Wheatland, J. (2021). Impact assessment of citizen science: State of the art and guiding principles for a consolidated approach. Sustainability Science, 16(5), 1683–1699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00959-2

[47]Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. (2015). Zambia's second national biodiversity strategy and action plan (NBSAP-2), 2015–2025. Government of the Republic of Zambia. https://www.cbd.int/doc/world/zm/zm-nbsap-v2-en.pdf

[48]Brooks, M., Rose, S., Altwegg, R., Lee, A. T. K., Nel, H., Ottosson, U., Retief, E., Reynolds, C., Ryan, P. G., Shema, S., Tende, T., Underhill, L. G., & Thomson, R. L. (2022). The African Bird Atlas Project: A description of the project and BirdMap data-collection protocol. Ostrich, 93(4), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2022.2125097

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Article Sidebar

Information Fusion

How to Cite

Main Article Content

Authors

Abstract

Article Details

References

Similar Articles