Main Article Content

Authors

Josef Myslín

Abstract

Trust represents a fundamental pillar of contemporary security policy, influencing decision-making processes, institutional stability, and the effectiveness of security measures at both national and international levels. This article explores trust as a key precondition for the formulation and implementation of security policy, emphasizing its role in relations between states, within security institutions, and between public authorities and society. The analysis focuses on trust as a multidimensional concept encompassing political legitimacy, transparency, accountability, and the credibility of security actors. Particular attention is paid to the consequences of declining trust, including increased social polarization, weakened resilience of democratic systems, and reduced effectiveness of collective security arrangements. The article argues that building and maintaining trust is not merely a normative objective, but a strategic necessity for ensuring long-term security and stability in an increasingly complex and uncertain security environment.Through comparative analysis of selected European states (Finland, Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary, France, and Estonia), the paper identifies critical determinants of trust, including transparency, institutional neutrality, crisis communication, and historical path-dependence. The findings demonstrate that trust acts as both an input to and an output of security policy, reinforcing legitimacy through reciprocity between citizens and the state.The article concludes that sustained trust-building must be recognized as a strategic dimension of security governance. Trust-based security strengthens societal resilience, mitigates polarization, and enhances adaptive capacity in hybrid threat environments. 

Keywords:
public trust, national security policy, governance, institutional trust, risk management, security governance, hybrid threats

Article Details

References

[1]Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)Wæver, O. (2011). Politics, security, theory. Security Dialogue, 42(4–5), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010611418718

[2]Tyler, T. R. (2006). Why people obey the law. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400828609

[3]Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685853808

[4]Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Wiley.

[5]Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.

[6]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Building trust to reinforce democracy: OECD trust survey. OECD Publishing.

[7]European Commission. (2023). Citizens’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU in 2023 (Special Eurobarometer 3010). https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/3010

[8]RAND Europe. (2020). Public trust in crisis communication: Lessons from COVID-19 and hybrid threats. RAND Corporation.

[9]NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. (2023). Trust in the digital age: Strategic communications and hybrid threats.

[10]Hoffman, S. (2002). World disorders: Troubled peace in the post-Cold War era. Rowman & Littlefield.

[11]Kirchner, E., & Sperling, J. (2007). EU security governance. Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203964705

[12]RAND Europe. (2021). Institutional trust and security cooperation in Europe. RAND Corporation.

[13]Krahmann, E. (2003). Conceptualizing security governance. Cooperation and Conflict, 38(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836703038001001

[14]Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792

[15]Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731

[16]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Trust in government: Comparative insights 2024. OECD Publishing.

[17]Spadaro, G., Gangl, K., & Van Prooijen, J. W. (2020). Enhancing feelings of security: How institutional trust promotes interpersonal trust. PLOS ONE, 15(9), Article e0237934. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237934

[18]Kelemen, R., Farkas, Á., Bučko, B., & Jordan, Z. (2024). Public trust in national security institutions as a key to sustainable security. Connections: The Quarterly Journal, 23(4), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.11610/Connections.23.4.03

[19]Ball, K., Degli Esposti, S., Dibb, S., & Pavone, V. (2019). Institutional trustworthiness and national security governance. Governance, 32(4), 729–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12353

[20]Keating, V., & Wheeler, N. (2013). From mutual trust to the culture of trust in international relations. International Politics, 50(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2013.11

[21]Vainauskas, A. (2025). From trust to commitment: Public trust in security-related institutions. Vilnius University Press.

[22]Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2004). International governance as new raison d’état? European Journal of International Relations, 10(2), 147–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104042933

[23]RAND Europe. (2023). Resilience through trust: Comparative assessment of European security governance. RAND Corporation.